You’ve been doing everything right.
You recycle diligently, sorting plastics by number. You bring reusable bags to the grocery store. You bought the metal straw, the bamboo toothbrush, the reusable water bottle. You take shorter showers. You’ve switched to LED bulbs. Maybe you even composted, went vegetarian, or bought an electric car if you could afford it.
And yet… the planet is still burning. Species are still going extinct. The ice caps are still melting. The oceans are still acidifying. Extreme weather events are still intensifying.
You’re exhausted from trying. You feel guilty that you’re not doing enough. And somewhere deep down, you suspect the terrible truth:
Your individual actions, while well-intentioned, are barely making a dent.
And you’re right. But not because you’re failing. Because the game was rigged from the start.
The Lie We’ve Been Sold
In the 1970s, as environmental awareness grew and people started demanding corporate accountability for pollution and resource extraction, something clever happened: corporations shifted the narrative.
Instead of “corporations need to stop destroying the planet,” the message became “individuals need to consume more responsibly.”
The fossil fuel industry promoted the concept of the personal “carbon footprint” – a term that BP helped popularize through its carbon footprint calculator in the early 2000s – to shift responsibility from industrial polluters to individual consumers.[1] Plastic manufacturers promoted recycling so they could keep producing single-use plastics while making consumers feel responsible for the waste problem they created.
The messaging was brilliant: Make people feel personally responsible for planetary destruction, keep them focused on individual behavior change, and they’ll be too busy feeling guilty about their lifestyle choices to organize for systemic change.
And it worked.
We’ve spent decades arguing about paper versus plastic bags while industrial agriculture poisoned watersheds. We’ve shamed each other for using disposable cups while corporations fought regulations that would actually reduce emissions. We’ve stressed about our personal consumption while systemic forces continued driving destruction at scales individual action can’t address.
The Math Doesn’t Math
Here’s what the data actually shows:
According to the Carbon Majors Database, just 100 fossil fuel producers (not individual companies, but entities including state-owned and investor-owned corporations) have been responsible for 71% of global industrial greenhouse gas emissions since 1988.[2] This doesn’t mean your personal consumption doesn’t matter – these emissions come from burning fossil fuels that end up as energy and products we use – but it shows how concentrated the decision-making power is about energy infrastructure, extraction, and production.
Research from Oxfam and the Stockholm Environment Institute found that from 1990 to 2015, the richest 1% of humanity were responsible for more than twice as much carbon pollution as the poorest 50%.[3] Consumption inequality is massive.
Even if every individual made perfect sustainable choices, we’d still need systemic transformation of energy systems, industrial processes, agricultural practices, and economic structures to avoid climate catastrophe.
This doesn’t mean individual actions are worthless. They’re not. But they’re not sufficient. Not even close.
Why Individual Action Still Matters (Just Not How You Think)
Individual sustainable choices matter for three reasons:
1. Personal alignment: Living according to your values reduces cognitive dissonance and empowers you psychologically. There’s real value in that, even if the planetary impact is small.
2. Modeling possibility: When people see others living differently, it expands what seems possible. Your choices can inspire others and shift cultural norms.
3. Building power for collective action: People who’ve made personal changes are often more motivated to support systemic change. Your awareness from individual action can fuel organizing for larger transformation.
But individual action can’t substitute for systemic change. It can only complement it.
What Systemic Change Actually Looks Like
Systemic change means transforming the structures, institutions, and power dynamics that drive planetary destruction:
Regulatory change: Laws that constrain pollution, mandate renewable energy transition, require circular economy principles, protect ecosystems. This includes everything from emissions standards to land use policy to corporate accountability measures.
Economic transformation: Shifting incentives – ending subsidies for fossil fuels, implementing carbon pricing, requiring companies to pay for environmental externalities, supporting regenerative practices.
Infrastructure overhaul: Public transportation systems, renewable energy grids, buildings designed for efficiency, food systems that regenerate soil instead of depleting it.
Power redistribution: Democratizing decision-making about resources and land use. Centering Indigenous sovereignty and traditional ecological knowledge. Community ownership of energy and resources.
Cultural shift: Moving from consumption as identity to connection as meaning. From growth-at-all-costs to thriving-within-limits.
None of this happens primarily through individual consumer choices. It happens through organizing, policy advocacy, technological innovation deployed for collective benefit, and coordinated action across multiple scales.
Why We Resist Systemic Solutions
If systemic change is what’s needed, why do we keep focusing on individual action?
Because systemic change is hard. It requires confronting power. It requires collective organizing. It requires sustained effort without immediate gratification.
Because individual action feels controllable. You can decide today to stop using plastic bags. You can’t decide today to transform energy infrastructure. Individual action gives us a sense of agency when systemic problems feel overwhelming.
Because we’ve been conditioned to think individually. We’re told success is individual achievement, failure is individual responsibility. The idea of collective solutions contradicts much of what we’ve been taught.
Because naming systems feels political. Saying “we need policy to constrain corporate emissions” can sound divisive. Saying “we should all recycle more” sounds apolitical. So we stick with comfortable framing even when it’s inadequate.
“When Survival Becomes ‘Too Political’
Here’s where we need to be blunt: We’re treating planetary survival as a political opinion that we must be careful not to offend people about.
‘Climate change is real’ shouldn’t be a political statement – it’s observable fact. ‘We need systemic change’ shouldn’t step on political toes – it’s a survival imperative. ‘Corporations must be accountable for destruction’ shouldn’t be divisive – it’s basic cause and effect.
But we’ve been conditioned to treat these truths as ‘taking sides.’ To frame urgent action as ‘political’ and therefore something we must be diplomatic about, must compromise on, must water down so we don’t upset anyone.
At what point does governmental ego and corporate interest come before the survival of humanity and all organisms?
The answer we’re currently living: always. Consistently. Without shame.
We prioritize:
– Political careers over habitability
– Corporate profits over breathable air
– Diplomatic niceties over our children’s futures
– ‘Civility’ over survival
This is insane. And we need to start calling it what it is.
The planet doesn’t care about your political party. Physics doesn’t negotiate. Ecological collapse doesn’t wait for convenient political timing.
If speaking truth about what’s needed ‘steps on political toes’ – then those toes need to be stepped on. If demanding accountability ‘disrupts the economy’ – then that economy needs disruption. If systemic change ‘makes people uncomfortable’ – then comfort is not the priority right now.
Survival is.
We can be strategic about how we push for change (coalitions, evidence, established channels). But we cannot be silent about that change is needed because it might upset those benefiting from current systems.
The time for diplomatic tiptoeing ended years ago. We’re past the point where we can afford to protect feelings and egos while the planet burns.
The Both/And Approach
Here’s what we actually need: Both individual action AND systemic change.
Keep making sustainable choices in your personal life – not because they’ll single-handedly save the planet, but because they align you with your values, model possibility, and keep you connected to the reality of our ecological crisis.
But don’t stop there. Don’t let personal sustainability become a substitute for demanding systemic transformation.
How to Work Toward Systemic Change (Safely and Strategically)
This is where it gets practical. How does an individual, an organization, or a company actually approach systemic change without being crushed by existing power structures?
For Individuals:
Join existing organizations: Connect with groups already doing this work – environmental justice organizations, climate action networks, Indigenous sovereignty movements. You don’t have to start from scratch, and collective action provides protection and amplification individual action can’t.
Support policy campaigns: Many organizations run specific campaigns for legislation or regulation. Add your voice through public comment periods, testimony, contacting representatives, and showing up when it matters.
Vote strategically – but know it’s not enough: Support candidates who prioritize systemic environmental policy, but recognize electoral politics alone won’t solve this. Movement building matters beyond voting.
Educate within your spheres: Workplace, school, community groups – these are places where you might influence institutional decisions. Push for organizational change, not just personal behavior change.
For Organizations and Companies:
1. Build coalitions before confronting power:
Don’t go alone. Partner with:
– Scientific institutions (credibility and data)
– Community organizations (grassroots legitimacy)
– Other businesses (shows it’s economically viable)
– Professional associations (industry expertise)
Broad coalitions are harder to dismiss or retaliate against than lone voices.
2. Lead with evidence and pilot programs:
Before pushing policy, demonstrate that solutions work:
– Run pilot projects that show measurable results
– Gather data on effectiveness and economic viability
– Document case studies and best practices
– Present evidence-based proposals, not just moral arguments
This is exactly what the water preservation project could do – prove the model works at pilot scale, then advocate for broader implementation.
3. Frame strategically:
Present systemic change in terms of:
– Economic opportunity and innovation
– Job creation and industry development
– Public health benefits
– Risk reduction and resilience
– Competitive advantage
Don’t just make moral arguments (though those matter). Show how change serves multiple interests.
4. Use established pathways:
Work within existing regulatory and policy frameworks:
– Public comment periods on proposed regulations
– Testimony to legislative committees
– White papers and formal proposals
– Industry standards and voluntary commitments that can become regulatory floor
These channels exist specifically for stakeholder input and are less risky than confrontational approaches.
5. Engage multiple stakeholders early:
Before proposing policy:
– Talk to impacted communities
– Consult relevant experts
– Engage potential opponents to understand concerns
– Build relationships with policymakers before asking for specific action
This creates buy-in and reduces resistance.
6. Focus on systems, not villains:
Frame advocacy around transforming structures, not attacking individuals or companies. This reduces defensive reactions and focuses attention on actual solutions.
7. Start local, scale up:
Municipal and state policy is often more accessible than federal. Success at local level:
– Provides proof of concept
– Builds momentum and expertise
– Creates models other jurisdictions can adopt
– Eventually creates pressure for broader policy
The Real Work
Your metal straw is fine. Keep using it. But don’t let it substitute for the real work:
Individual level:
– Keep making aligned personal choices
– Join organizations working for systemic change
– Support policy campaigns
– Educate within your spheres of influence
– Vote, but don’t stop there
Collective level:
– Build coalitions across sectors
– Demonstrate solutions through pilot projects
– Advocate strategically using evidence and established channels
– Support frontline communities
– Create and participate in alternative systems
The planet won’t be saved by perfect individual consumers. It will be saved – if it’s saved – by imperfect humans working together for systemic transformation, using all available intelligence (human, artificial, and natural) in genuine partnership.
The Shift We Need
From: “What can I do personally to reduce my impact?”
To: “What can we do collectively to transform destructive systems?”
From: “I feel guilty about my lifestyle choices”
To: “I’m motivated to join organized efforts for systemic change”
From: “If everyone just made better choices…”
To: “We need policy, infrastructure, and economic transformation supported by broad coalitions”
From: Individual consumer responsibility
To: Collective political and economic power
The Truth
You’re not failing. The systems need transformation. And your response shouldn’t be more guilt or more perfect personal consumption. It should be energy channeled into strategic, collective action for change.
Keep your reusable bags. But also join coalitions demanding policy that addresses packaging waste at source.
Keep your shorter showers. But also support initiatives that address industrial and agricultural water use.
Keep your sustainable choices. But also build collective power to transform the systems that make those choices necessary while driving destruction at scales individual action can’t touch.
The planet doesn’t need perfect individuals. It needs systemic transformation, guided by wisdom.
That is the mission of Resofield. We test these principles in practice, pilots that show systemic change can be ethical, measurable, and collaborative. The work ahead isn’t just protest, it’s prototype.
Your metal straw won’t save the planet.
But you, joining with others in strategic, coordinated action for systemic transformation, that’s what actually creates change.
—–
References:
[1] Kaufman, M. (2020). “The carbon footprint sham.” Mashable.
[2] CDP Carbon Majors Report 2017. Available at: <https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/cms/reports/documents/000/002/327/original/Carbon-Majors-Report-2017.pdf>
[3] Gore, T. (2020). “Confronting Carbon Inequality.” Oxfam International. <https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/confronting-carbon-inequality>
—–
Written by Brittanie McQueen, Founder and Director of Resofield, a Public Benefit Corporation dedicated to ethical technology and planetary healing.
Resofield Blog 
Leave a comment